The name "allow_artifacts" and associated description is very vague, and
theoretically allow for tearing behavior. Clarify that we only intend to
mean artifacts related to output configuration (e.g., modesets).
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/issues/3740
There were a couple of problems with this:
1. The behavior is unexpected. Typically objects in wlroots won't
also destroy objects that they depend on. For instance, wlr_scene_output
will not destroy the wlr_output when it's destroyed. It shouldn't be any
different for scene layouts.
2. This fixes a crash where because wlr_output_layout and wlr_scene_output
are both addons to wlr_output, we might get into a situation where
wl_list_for_each_safe might malfunction. See [1]
This means that the compositor needs to manually destroy the output
when they destroy the layout, hence ~breaking. Compositors can just
call `wlr_scene_output_destroy()` if they want to destroy both at the
same time.
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/merge_requests/4358#note_2106260
This reverts commit 1a731596c5.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Primak <vyivel@eclair.cafe>
It makes little sense to have a catch-all grab vaildation function,
considering that e.g. tablet tool implicit grabs are possible as well.
Besides, the function has always returned true anyway.
wlr_scene_output_layout_add_output() was made public by f5917f0247
("scene_output_layout: make output adding explicit") but the ownership
semantics are not obvious and should be clarified.
Up until now, frame/present events were only triggered when the
user submitted a buffer. Change the wlr_output API so that these
events are triggered when any commit is applied on an enabled
output.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/issues/3708
Fixes an error seen in labwc CI builds with -Werror:
../subprojects/wlroots/include/wlr/types/wlr_gamma_control_v1.h:44:16:
error: ‘struct wlr_output_state’ declared inside parameter list
will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration [-Werror]
44 | struct wlr_output_state *output_state);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The backend is not able to tell whether a surface is being
presented via direct scan-out or not. The backend will set
ZERO_COPY if the buffer submitted via the output commit was
presented in a zero-copy fashion, but will no know whether the
buffer comes from the compositor or the client.
Using "present" is confusing here: the event is emitted when the
buffer is being sampled to be displayed on an output, not when it's
being presented on-screen.
Rename to match the presentation-time terminology.
Simon Ser
Kirill Primak
Kenny Levinsen
Alexander Orzechowski
JiDe Zhang
Simon Zeni
vaxerski
John Lindgren
Manuel Stoeckl
Rose Hudson
Leonardo Hernández Hernández
rewine
rewine