You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

Rouven Czerwinski e4909ab4a3 transaction: destroying nodes aren't hidden ... Commit 37d7bc6998 ("transaction: Only wait for ack from visible views") introduced a check which uses view_is_visible() to check if a view is still visible on the screen. However view_is_visible() will early return in case the node is in the destroying state. This is incorrect for transactions, since a destroying view which is visible will trigger configure events for other clients. This bug was visible when repeatedly opening and closing two views side by side, since we ignore the destroying node we get a frame where the still open view is shown with the old configure values and the rest is the desktop background. The next frame is than correct again. Fix this by considering destroying views as visible, we correctly wait for them and send the configure events to other views in time, fixing the background flicker. Fixes #6473		3 years ago
..
desktop.c	Stop using wlr_output->{lx,ly}	6 years ago
idle_inhibit_v1.c	idle_inhibit: Fix tree view after changes in commit 152a559e	3 years ago
layer_shell.c	Upgrade for wlroots surface refactoring	3 years ago
output.c	Upgrade for wlroots surface refactoring	3 years ago
render.c	Upgrade for wlroots surface refactoring	3 years ago
surface.c	Upgrade for wlroots surface refactoring	3 years ago
transaction.c	transaction: destroying nodes aren't hidden	3 years ago
xdg_shell.c	xdg-shell: use toplevel geometry to adjust the popup box	3 years ago
xwayland.c	xwayland: Clear wlr_xwayland_surface in handle_destroy	3 years ago