From 0a522cb79885667e1ca3cafd0b6581ba8a3e92d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Ser Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:28:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] backend/libinput: use wl_array for wlr_libinput_tablet.tools Instead of using a single-field wl_list, let's just use a wl_array. --- backend/libinput/tablet_tool.c | 52 +++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/backend/libinput/tablet_tool.c b/backend/libinput/tablet_tool.c index 5b867cef..8b143e7f 100644 --- a/backend/libinput/tablet_tool.c +++ b/backend/libinput/tablet_tool.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include #include #include "backend/libinput.h" +#include "util/array.h" #include "util/signal.h" static const struct wlr_tablet_impl tablet_impl; @@ -29,18 +30,9 @@ struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool { size_t pad_refs; }; -// TODO: Maybe this should be a wlr_list? Do we keep it, or want to get rid of -// it? -struct tablet_tool_list_elem { - struct wl_list link; - - struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool; -}; - struct wlr_libinput_tablet { struct wlr_tablet wlr_tablet; - - struct wl_list tools; // tablet_tool_list_elem::link + struct wl_array tools; // struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool * }; static void destroy_tool(struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool) { @@ -56,17 +48,13 @@ static void destroy_tablet(struct wlr_tablet *wlr_tablet) { struct wlr_libinput_tablet *tablet = wl_container_of(wlr_tablet, tablet, wlr_tablet); - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *pos; - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *tmp; - wl_list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &tablet->tools, link) { - struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool = pos->tool; - wl_list_remove(&pos->link); - free(pos); - + struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool; + wl_array_for_each(tool, &tablet->tools) { if (--tool->pad_refs == 0) { destroy_tool(tool); } } + wl_array_release(&tablet->tools); free(tablet); } @@ -94,7 +82,7 @@ struct wlr_tablet *create_libinput_tablet( wlr_tablet->name = strdup(libinput_device_get_name(libinput_dev)); - wl_list_init(&libinput_tablet->tools); + wl_array_init(&libinput_tablet->tools); return wlr_tablet; } @@ -163,9 +151,9 @@ static void ensure_tool_reference(struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool, struct wlr_libinput_tablet *tablet = wl_container_of(wlr_dev, tablet, wlr_tablet); - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *pos; - wl_list_for_each(pos, &tablet->tools, link) { - if (pos->tool == tool) { // We already have a ref + struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *iter; + wl_array_for_each(iter, &tablet->tools) { + if (iter == tool) { // We already have a ref // XXX: We *could* optimize the tool to the front of // the list here, since we will probably get the next // couple of events from the same tool. @@ -176,15 +164,13 @@ static void ensure_tool_reference(struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *tool, } } - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *new = - calloc(1, sizeof(struct tablet_tool_list_elem)); - if (!new) { + struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool **dst = + wl_array_add(&tablet->tools, sizeof(tool)); + if (!dst) { wlr_log(WLR_ERROR, "Failed to allocate memory for tracking tablet tool"); return; } - - new->tool = tool; - wl_list_insert(&tablet->tools, &new->link); + *dst = tool; ++tool->pad_refs; } @@ -297,15 +283,15 @@ void handle_tablet_tool_proximity(struct libinput_event *event, assert(tablet_is_libinput(wlr_dev->tablet)); struct wlr_libinput_tablet *tablet = wl_container_of(wlr_dev->tablet, tablet, wlr_tablet); - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *pos; - struct tablet_tool_list_elem *tmp; - wl_list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &tablet->tools, link) { - if (pos->tool == tool) { - wl_list_remove(&pos->link); - free(pos); + size_t i = 0; + struct wlr_libinput_tablet_tool *iter; + wl_array_for_each(iter, &tablet->tools) { + if (iter == tool) { + array_remove_at(&tablet->tools, i * sizeof(tool), sizeof(tool)); break; } + i++; } destroy_tool(tool);